A better question might be how many people who award the Nobel prize actually believe in God or Creation. If your underlying presupposition is that there is no God than you will never appreciate the work of a creation scientist.
Since the Nobel prizes are awarded based on financial donations and most creationists are upright, no they probably don’t have a lot of Nobel prizes in their corner.
Most Nobel prize winners have been Jews, however, and many many Jews are, less conspicuously, creationists. There are probably more Nobel winning creation scientists than you know.
I would consider Francis Crick to be, at the least, a proponent of ID since he held fast to the idea of Panspermia. Being planted here by highly evolved aliens begs the question of origins and requires just as much faith as God.
Bless up.
A law of physics: You cannot either create or destroy (matter or light), only change it. Science does not allow for creation, only observes it, quantifies it, classifies it.
Therefore, the word “creation,” is a contradiction of the basis of science, which cannot account for creativity, only the results.
I know that Einstein Believed in the Superior Intelligent Design
“In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views.”
“I’m not an atheist and I don’t think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangements of the books, but doesn’t know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God.”
There was a Creationist who claimed that his Creationism was what excluded him from getting it. The givers say that wasn’t a factor.
He’s a doctor–the guy who adapted MRI scans to the medical field and patented them.
How he’s a doctor who doesn’t accept evolution’s beyond me, but takes all kinds, I guess.
There is no such thing as a “creation scientist” Only charlatans like Kent Hovind who pretend to have a degree of any kind.
A better question might be how many people who award the Nobel prize actually believe in God or Creation. If your underlying presupposition is that there is no God than you will never appreciate the work of a creation scientist.
Since the Nobel prizes are awarded based on financial donations and most creationists are upright, no they probably don’t have a lot of Nobel prizes in their corner.
Most Nobel prize winners have been Jews, however, and many many Jews are, less conspicuously, creationists. There are probably more Nobel winning creation scientists than you know.
I would consider Francis Crick to be, at the least, a proponent of ID since he held fast to the idea of Panspermia. Being planted here by highly evolved aliens begs the question of origins and requires just as much faith as God.
Bless up.
A law of physics: You cannot either create or destroy (matter or light), only change it. Science does not allow for creation, only observes it, quantifies it, classifies it.
Therefore, the word “creation,” is a contradiction of the basis of science, which cannot account for creativity, only the results.
I know that Einstein Believed in the Superior Intelligent Design
“In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views.”
“I’m not an atheist and I don’t think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangements of the books, but doesn’t know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God.”
There was a Creationist who claimed that his Creationism was what excluded him from getting it. The givers say that wasn’t a factor.
He’s a doctor–the guy who adapted MRI scans to the medical field and patented them.
How he’s a doctor who doesn’t accept evolution’s beyond me, but takes all kinds, I guess.
How many creationists are on the Nobel Prize award committee?
How many have even published ONE paper in a peer-reviewed journal?
They prefer to hear the “Well done you good and faithful servant” from Jesus.
They are Godpleasers not menpleasers.
why not ask…why are most nobel prize winners are jewish?
because of the GOD mind/smarts are them.
The same number of monkeys that have mastered the game of chess…
Creationist don’t deserve a any prizes. They need to use their brains!
ROFL.
I would guess 0. Don’t have any sources :[
how many atheists have won a Creation debate?
I doubt if any have won. Science is in the business of rejecting God.